Some people ask, with shame: “Did masturbation make me depressed?” The research answer is more precise than yes or no. Here I weigh three sources: a meta-analysis on shame, guilt and depression, a case report of a teenager who attributed his depression to masturbation, and a review of the culture-bound “Dhat” syndrome. Then, under a clear “theoretical interpretation” label, I look at Freud’s view of the Oedipus complex and the superego. None of these sources shows that masturbation causes depression; they point to a possible role of shame and belief and do not establish causation.
The meta-analysis by Kim, Thibodeau and Jorgensen (2011) pooled 242 effect sizes from 108 studies with 22,411 participants. Shame correlated with depressive symptoms (r = .43) more strongly than guilt did (r = .28). But shame was statistically indistinguishable from two maladaptive forms of guilt: contextual-maladaptive guilt, an exaggerated sense of responsibility for events outside one’s control (r = .39), and generalized guilt, “free-floating” guilt detached from any specific context (r = .42).
External shame, seeing oneself through other people’s eyes, correlated more strongly (r = .56) than internal shame (r = .42).
The data are correlational, and the authors call the causal interpretation ambiguous. The meta-analysis is not about masturbation; applying it to masturbation guilt is our inference, not the authors’ finding.
A man on an analytic couch with his forearm over his eyes: psychotherapy asks what a behaviour means to the person — Image: AI-generated
Quotable line: In one meta-analysis, shame correlated with depressive symptoms more strongly than guilt did, but was statistically indistinguishable from two maladaptive forms of guilt (generalized and contextual-maladaptive).
A case report: when a belief about harm becomes part of the illness
The report by Albobali and Madi (2021) describes a 17-year-old single Muslim young man who attributed three months of declining mental and physical health to a few months of daily masturbation. His symptoms included low mood, an “inability to feel anything anymore”, loss of pleasure, poor memory and concentration, interrupted sleep and poor appetite. Despite trying to stop completely, the symptoms persisted. He felt hopeless, had suicidal ideas without intent or plan, and felt he had caused “irreparable damage” to his body.
Treatment was combined: fluoxetine 20 mg then 40 mg, risperidone 1 mg added after little improvement at four weeks, supplements, and weekly psychotherapy. After three months he improved and passed his exams; risperidone was later stopped. The authors judged his guilt to be of delusional intensity and classified the depression as severe with a psychotic feature. The guilt had two sources: the belief that masturbation had ruined his life, and the belief that it is forbidden in Islam. Even after recovery he kept that causal belief.
The limits are clear: one patient, no comparison group. The report cannot show that masturbation caused the depression; the authors say guilt “contributed” to the illness. Clinically, the point worth noting is that attempts to stop the behaviour did not reverse the symptoms and that improvement followed combined treatment with medication, supplements and psychotherapy; the report cannot say which part mattered.
Quotable line: In this case report, the authors judged that in one patient guilt about masturbation contributed to severe depression with a psychotic feature; but a single patient cannot prove a causal link.
Culture and the fear of semen loss: Dhat syndrome
The review by Strong and colleagues (2022) describes Dhat syndrome as a culture-bound psychiatric syndrome found mostly in the Indian subcontinent, defined by an experiential fear of losing semen through ejaculation, nocturnal emission or other means. It stresses that generalized depression and anxiety can persist alongside it and are common and non-specific. Its authors state that treatment is the same as for major depressive disorder.
The case report above also cites Dhat and the Chinese syndrome “Shen-kui”. Dhat is a fear of losing semen and guilt is a moral appraisal; our inference is that both suggest the meaning a person gives a behaviour can shape symptoms. A limit: the review has no data on masturbation guilt.
Quotable line: According to one review, Dhat syndrome is an experiential fear of losing semen, and depression and anxiety can persist alongside it.
A psychoanalytic reading: Oedipus complex, superego and guilt (theoretical interpretation, not empirical finding)
This section is not evidence; it is an interpretive lens. In “The Ego and the Id” (1923) Freud described the superego as the heir of the Oedipus complex, and in “The Dissolution of the Oedipus Complex” (1924) he tied the end of that complex to the formation of the superego. In this framework, and as our interpretive extension rather than a claim of the cited Freud texts, guilt after masturbation need not come only from outside prohibition (religion or family); the internalized superego can be a source too. According to the case-report authors, Freud saw a link between masturbation and neurasthenia, a historical hypothesis the studies above did not test.
None of the three studies tested this framework, and it should not be treated as evidence. Its value, in my view, lies in the question it opens: where does the guilt originate, and how much of it is a conscious moral appraisal versus an unconscious one.
Quotable line: In a psychoanalytic reading, guilt after masturbation may come from a superego rooted in the Oedipus complex; this is a theoretical interpretation that has not been tested empirically.
A case report describes a teenager whose guilt, according to the authors, contributed to depressive illness, and a meta-analysis shows shame and guilt correlate with depressive symptoms. Neither proves causation, and the meta-analysis is not about masturbation.
What is the difference between shame and guilt?
As our working definition, guilt concerns an act (“I did something I do not like”) and shame concerns the whole self (“I am bad”). The meta-analysis tied shame more strongly to depressive symptoms, though it was statistically indistinguishable from two maladaptive forms of guilt.
What is Dhat syndrome, and how does it relate to masturbation?
The review by Strong and colleagues describes Dhat as an experiential fear of losing semen through ejaculation, nocturnal emission or other means. The case-report authors add that its symptoms are attributed to semen loss through masturbation or nocturnal emission.
When should I talk to a professional?
This is clinical advice, not a research finding: when guilt or shame persists, interferes with sleep, concentration, work or relationships, or comes with hopelessness. If you are thinking of ending your life, contact emergency services or a local crisis line right away.
What do these sources say together?
The data are limited: 108 studies in the meta-analysis, one patient in the case report, and one review. None tested whether masturbation causes or treats depression.
My position is clear: the belief about harm, the content of the shame and the meaning a person gives the behaviour deserve more clinical attention than the frequency of the behaviour; in the one reviewed case, attempts to stop the behaviour did not reverse the symptoms. The moral question lies outside the reach of this evidence.
Looking for professional support with your relationship or mental health?
Kim S, Thibodeau R, Jorgensen RS. Shame, guilt, and depressive symptoms: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(1):68-96. PMID: 21219057. DOI: 10.1037/a0021466
Albobali Y, Madi MY. Masturbatory Guilt Leading to Severe Depression. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e13626. PMID: 33816025. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13626
Strong YN, Li A, White ME, et al. Dhat Syndrome: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Comorbidities, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management. Health Psychol Res. 2022;10(4):38759. PMID: 36425228. DOI: 10.52965/001c.38759
Freud S. The Ego and the Id (1923). In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19. London: Hogarth Press; 1961. (theoretical source)
Freud S. The Dissolution of the Oedipus Complex (1924). In: The Standard Edition, Vol. 19. London: Hogarth Press; 1961. (theoretical source)
Image Credits
All three images in this article are AI-generated and come from the site’s own image library. No real person is depicted.
